Show vs. Tell Is Bad Advice: Here’s What It Actually Means

“Show don’t tell” exists because of a real problem. A lot of writers, especially early on, over-explain. They state what a character feels and then immediately show it anyway, doubling the work. Or they summarize events instead of putting the reader in the room. Or they announce the theme of a scene instead of letting the scene carry it.

• Why it worksThe underlying principle is sound. Readers who experience something alongside a character feel more than readers who are told what to feel. In The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini, the guilt Amir carries isn’t announced. It’s visible in every choice he makes, every moment he doesn’t speak up, every time he takes the easier path. Readers feel the weight of it because they watch it accumulate. In Pachinko by Min Jin Lee, generational grief and shame work the same way. The emotion lives in behavior and consequence rather than declaration.
• How to do itBefore writing an emotion, ask what the character does instead of feeling it directly. What do they reach for? What do they avoid? What do they notice that has nothing to do with the situation because the real thing is too much to look at directly? That displacement is usually more powerful than stating the feeling outright.
  

Here’s the part the advice leaves out. Telling is a tool. Sometimes it’s the right tool. A writer who has internalized “show don’t tell” so completely that they never tell anything produces prose that is exhausting to read. Not every moment needs a full sensory rendering. Not every emotion needs to be performed on the page.

• Why it worksTelling works when the emotion is small enough that rendering it fully would give it more weight than it deserves. It works when the narrative is moving fast and a full emotional beat would kill the momentum. And it works when the character’s voice is so specific and strong that their flat statement of fact carries more feeling than any amount of physical description would.
  
  In The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro, Stevens tells the reader things constantly. He summarizes, he glosses, he moves efficiently through events. The telling is the character — a man who cannot bring himself to examine his own life closely. The restraint is the emotion. Showing every beat would destroy the effect entirely.
• How to do itTrust the voice. If a character would say something plainly, let them say it plainly. The specificity of who is saying it and how they say it carries the weight. A flat declarative from a character the reader knows well lands completely differently than the same flat declarative from a stranger on page three.

In The Death of Me, Katie says this:

I’d already decided that was okay, because I’d fallen in love. I’d experienced something on my list I never thought I would. And I was okay with that.

Flat. Plain. No performance. She doesn’t tremble or tear up or stare at the middle distance. She just tells you, and then she moves on, because that’s who Katie is. The plainness of the statement is the character. Showing it would have been wrong — it would have made the moment too large, too dramatic, too much like a fifteen year old who thinks her feelings deserve a spotlight. The telling is the voice. And the voice is the whole book.

The actual question worth asking isn’t “am I showing or telling?” It’s “is the reader feeling what I need them to feel here, and is the method I’m using the right tool for this specific moment?”

Sometimes that’s showing. Sometimes it’s telling. Sometimes it’s a sentence of telling followed by a moment of showing followed by a character who doesn’t react at all, because the non-reaction is the most interesting thing in the scene.

• Why it worksWriters who understand what each tool does and when to reach for it produce prose that reads as effortless, because the form is invisible. In Olive Kitteridge, Elizabeth Strout moves between close observation and flat declarative statement constantly. The switches are invisible because they’re always correct. In A Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan, the form keeps changing entirely, and it works because every choice is intentional.
• How to do itRead the scene back and ask whether the reader is getting what they need from each moment. Not “did I show this” or “did I tell this” — but “does this land.” If it lands, the method was right. If it doesn’t, change the method and try again. That’s the actual revision process the advice is trying to shortcut, and it can’t be shortcut.

“Show don’t tell” points at a real problem and fails to describe it accurately, which means writers spend years trying to follow advice they don’t fully understand, overcorrecting in one direction and then the other.

The problem it’s trying to fix is over-explanation and emotional announcement. The solution is knowing what each tool does and choosing the right one for the moment in front of you. That’s harder to say in a critique session. It’s also the only version of the advice that actually helps.

• Read about Salt & Bone
• Read about The Death of Me
• Sign up for the newsletter to get weekly tips
• The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini
• Pachinko by Min Jin Lee
• The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro
• Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout
• A Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan